more info: g0v summit 2014 hackfoldr
現場直播網址 (live url)
錄影紀錄網址 (video url)
照片紀錄網址 (photos url)
↓文字轉播、線上討論↓
slides url
slides url
介紹G0V的由來
台灣社會發生了很多事，因此有人開始思考用科技改變一些事。
我們從數位世代的角度，如何從零去思考，政府怎樣跟人民互動。
政治獻金的數位化，醫療系統看板，食安事件豬油的統計，議員投票指南（平時議員做了些什麼事），在３１８時也有很多人跨出了虛擬的世界，到現場直播去做一些事。
這兩年來，我們達到目標嗎？這是我們的目標嗎？事實上非常非常的少，因此我們今天在這邊，希望在這裡跟大家學習，分享，交流。
交流第一步是先認識彼此，先找你旁邊一位不認識的朋友打招呼。。。
（看來大家欲罷不能。。。）
其實今天我們所有四個議程都會在線上直播，如果你要分享，請用#g0vsummit這個hashtag
(接著介紹今天規定，議程及閃電秀，明日的自由提案示範，特別感謝）
David Eaves
history of opening up the government
the first one is 1766 Sweden
1966 US
1970 Norway
1974 US
Access Information Act
why?
reason one
1974 Nixson
progressive coalitions/political trust crisis
Because Richard Nixon who broke political trust and caused everyone to believe we should not have this happen ever again.
reason two
widespread use of photocopiers
"FOIA is predicated on the existence of copiers"
there’s some form of public demand of change that combines with some form of re-oganization that combines with technology that can promote the changes we need(?)
how do we increase the size of this sweet spot (Techonology + Organization + Public Demand)
for me to increase the organization is more important
Environmental group say greenpeace
a very clear notion of how to implement a big change
what we want to change -> analysis -> theory -> develop campaign -> implement -> big change happens
(big chart of greenpeace campaign)
in gov space there are times that we get angry and know what we want to change and skip the analysis and go straight to the implementation
what you actually want to change? what is your goal? change gov? make a good public site for people to use easily? have fun? these are all valid goals
Beware of shifting goals. the real risk of me [on making the Open Data website] is to shift the goal from changing the gov to embarrassing the gov. this is also a valid goal because this would increase public demand(?), but you have to know what you are doing
Big Tent
you (people in this room) are a big tent coalition
when you have a big tent you have to acknowledge different motivations
and the big risks is to start judging people because they don’t have to same goal as you
it is *great* that you have a diversity of goals
the real question is how do we make each of us achieve what each of us what
patriot - careerist - the evangelist
they actually have different goals and it is easy for them see only their differences and to forget what they are trying to accomplish together
have one community vs infect our communities
a single conf is important but i think it is not as important as it used to be
so your job is not only to go to this conference but also to *infest* all other communities
if you’re a journalist go infect your colleagues
Power
what happens when we use that power to the effective and win?
Utopia!
Loggers （伐木業者） + Environmentalists + Open Data (map)
Chicago 選區劃分
I would argue that the district is a complete success
the only way you can do this is to have public consensus data and you can draw the district so that the parties can convientent win (i.e. gerrymandering)（用選區作弊）
The data IS political. (資料本身就是政治性的) Whether you are an engineer, it is a deeply political things you are doing.
Long form census. If I am a politician and I know that people are going to make big decisions using data, I would try to let people know what I want them to know
You in this room has a very special ability to know the implications of all this and it is your responsibilities to use this knowledge to public service and to let people know about this.
問題：我是老媒體人，如何建立跨世代的和解？