群眾編審法律
編輯歷史
| 時間 | 作者 | 版本 |
|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-05 15:14 – 15:14 | r611 – r621 | |
顯示 diff 群眾編審法律
主題法規的先期審議與共識凝聚 / Crowdsourced Law
+
+
+ 最新內容請至:
+ https://g0v.hackmd.io/0Lptz8SeTBSOReirCj7Zow
+
+
*Case / Project
(48 行未修改)
|
||
| 2017-12-08 17:01 – 17:02 | r605 – r610 | |
顯示 diff(30 行未修改)
*國教院版權與萌典的互動過程
*https://www.facebook.com/smea.gov.tw/videos/521216464886970/
+ *在2017上半年,《無限挑戰》製作了一集「國民議員特輯」,邀請韓國5大黨各派出一位議員,加上200位民眾一起商討有價值的立法案,當中《國會議員會議法》、《青年住居支援法》、《國會議員四屆連任限制法》、《打工勞動保護法》、《孕婦停車法》和《虐待兒童處罰加強法》這六項法案在韓國引起了不小的迴響。
+ *http://www.bomb01.com/article/48925
(16 行未修改)
|
||
| 2017-08-01 00:56 – 00:57 | r599 – r604 | |
顯示 diff(24 行未修改)
*Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxr6wNGxvhw
*Board: https://realtimeboard.com/app/board/o9J_k09jf0s=/
- *《金融創新實驗條例》及其模式架構
+ *《金融創新實驗條例》及其模式架構,創新法規沙盒
*https://youtu.be/P6bhnuMfgc0?t=2m39s
*提出預期違反的法規與命令 (法律不在其中)
*處理大陸法系法體制現況與修改機制
*國教院版權與萌典的互動過程
+ *https://www.facebook.com/smea.gov.tw/videos/521216464886970/
(16 行未修改)
|
||
| 2017-07-20 15:28 – 15:31 | r472 – r598 | |
顯示 diff 群眾編審法律
- Crowdsourced Law
-
- 待分類
- *法案 Open Sourcing https://c4t.hackpad.com/-Open-Sourcing-LK0TbSHeOX2
+ 主題法規的先期審議與共識凝聚 / Crowdsourced Law
- 主題法規的先期審議與共識凝聚
+ *Case / Project
*群眾編審法律的文獻與案例
*RegulationRoom is an experimental platform for public participation in government rulemaking processes created by a cross-disciplinary group of Cornell researchers, the Cornell eRulemaking Initiative (CeRI). CeRI uses selected live rulemakings to experiment with human and computer support for public engagement and discussion. The ultimate goal of RegulationRoom is to provide guidance on design, technological, and human intervention strategies—grounded in theory and tested in practice—for effective Rulemaking 2.0 systems.
(8 行未修改)
*How a complex network of bills becomes a law: Introducing a new data analysis of text incorporation!
*https://medium.com/@govtrack/how-a-complex-network-of-bills-becomes-a-law-9972b9624d36
- *Fork the Law - https://github.com/fork-the-law/hancock
- *Madison - http://opengovfoundation.org/the-madison-project
- *https://github.com/opengovfoundation/madison
- *http://stjornlagarad.is/ / 群眾外包再創新:冰島人民用Facebook修訂憲法
+ *美國總統歐巴馬利用Github Issues討論法案
+ *https://github.com/sunlightlabs/us-laws/issues
*Seattle Citizen Initiatives, Referenda & Charter 市政倡議與公投機制
- *vTaiwan
+ *http://stjornlagarad.is/ / 群眾外包再創新:冰島人民用Facebook修訂憲法
+ *vTaiwan 行政院法規線上諮詢系統
*公共政策網路參與平臺 https://join.gov.tw/
*自經區正反方比較表:http://fepztw.github.io/
(6 行未修改)
*處理大陸法系法體制現況與修改機制
*國教院版權與萌典的互動過程
+
+
+ *Tool / Code
+ *Fork the Law - https://github.com/fork-the-law/hancock
+ *Madison - http://opengovfoundation.org/the-madison-project
+ *https://github.com/opengovfoundation/madison
+ *Github and Government
+ *https://government.github.com/
+ *Japanese Law Sphinx-Doc : 使用sphinx-doc索引日本法條
+ *https://github.com/ledmonster/japanese-law
+ *g0v/twlaw 台灣法條爬蟲
+ *https://github.com/g0v/twlaw
+ *Taiwan Law Corpus : g0v台灣法律文集
+ *https://github.com/victorhsieh/tw-law-corpus
+ *OpenCongress
+ *http://www.opencongress.org/
+ *Sunlight Congress API
+ *https://sunlightlabs.github.io/congress/
|
||
| 2017-05-17 17:08 – 17:09 | r465 – r471 | |
顯示 diff(31 行未修改)
*https://youtu.be/P6bhnuMfgc0?t=2m39s
*提出預期違反的法規與命令 (法律不在其中)
- *處理大陸法系管制現況與修改機制
- *國教院版權與萌典
+ *處理大陸法系法體制現況與修改機制
+ *國教院版權與萌典的互動過程
|
||
| 2017-05-17 15:38 – 15:47 | r418 – r464 | |
顯示 diff(28 行未修改)
*Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxr6wNGxvhw
*Board: https://realtimeboard.com/app/board/o9J_k09jf0s=/
+ *《金融創新實驗條例》及其模式架構
+ *https://youtu.be/P6bhnuMfgc0?t=2m39s
+ *提出預期違反的法規與命令 (法律不在其中)
+ *處理大陸法系管制現況與修改機制
+ *國教院版權與萌典
|
||
| 2017-04-25 20:51 – 20:51 | r407 – r417 | |
顯示 diff(25 行未修改)
*公共政策網路參與平臺 https://join.gov.tw/
*自經區正反方比較表:http://fepztw.github.io/
+ *討論題目:各縣市廢除禁行機車及廢除強制兩段轉,但需要有配套措施
+ *Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxr6wNGxvhw
+ *Board: https://realtimeboard.com/app/board/o9J_k09jf0s=/
|
||
| 2017-04-18 18:51 – 19:21 | r369 – r406 | |
顯示 diff 群眾編審法律
+ Crowdsourced Law
+
待分類
*法案 Open Sourcing https://c4t.hackpad.com/-Open-Sourcing-LK0TbSHeOX2
(4 行未修改)
*Rulemaking 2.0: Understanding and Getting Better Public Participation
*Farina, Cynthia R. and Newhart, Mary J., "Rulemaking 2.0: Understanding and Getting Better Public Participation" (2013). Cornell e-Rulemaking Initiative Publications. Paper 15. - http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/ceri/15
+ *Rulemaking Process 101 http://rules.cityofnewyork.us/content/rulemaking-process-101
*Crowdsourcing in democracy: Crowdsourced Law Reform in Finland
*CROWDSOURCED OFF-ROAD TRAFFIC LAW EXPERIMENT IN FINLAND: Report about idea crowdsourcing and evaluation
+ *http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/462571475068174273/Citizen-engagement-in-rulemaking-evidence-on-regulatory-practices-in-185-countries
*Massachusetts Citizens’ Initiative Review Pilot Project
*http://www.cirmass2016.org/
+ *How a complex network of bills becomes a law: Introducing a new data analysis of text incorporation!
+ *https://medium.com/@govtrack/how-a-complex-network-of-bills-becomes-a-law-9972b9624d36
*Fork the Law - https://github.com/fork-the-law/hancock
*Madison - http://opengovfoundation.org/the-madison-project
(2 行未修改)
*Seattle Citizen Initiatives, Referenda & Charter 市政倡議與公投機制
*vTaiwan
+ *公共政策網路參與平臺 https://join.gov.tw/
*自經區正反方比較表:http://fepztw.github.io/
- \
|
||
| 2017-04-18 18:51 | r368 | |
顯示 diff(21 行未修改)
|
||
| 2017-04-18 18:46 – 18:51 | r362 – r367 | |
顯示 diff- 群眾編審法律 / 政策共識凝聚 / 工具
+ 群眾編審法律
待分類
*法案 Open Sourcing https://c4t.hackpad.com/-Open-Sourcing-LK0TbSHeOX2
(6 行未修改)
*Crowdsourcing in democracy: Crowdsourced Law Reform in Finland
*CROWDSOURCED OFF-ROAD TRAFFIC LAW EXPERIMENT IN FINLAND: Report about idea crowdsourcing and evaluation
+ *Massachusetts Citizens’ Initiative Review Pilot Project
+ *http://www.cirmass2016.org/
*Fork the Law - https://github.com/fork-the-law/hancock
*Madison - http://opengovfoundation.org/the-madison-project
(3 行未修改)
*vTaiwan
*自經區正反方比較表:http://fepztw.github.io/
-
- 議題的共識凝聚與探討
- *「城市對話」(stadsgesprek ,英譯為 City-wide conversation) 的公民參與實驗的推手,是烏特列支運輸、能源與環境副市長蘿特·范·何冬克 (Lot van Hooijdonk) 。而故事的起點,則是一個公民風力發電計畫引發的社會衝突。http://e-info.org.tw/node/116655
- *MAS Summit 2015: The City We Want http://www.mas.org/
-
- 廣泛提議式的網路平台,讓公眾提出政策意見
- *The Big Ideas Project - Find Big Ideas and vote for the ones you support. The Big Ideas Project, launched in December 2014 by the Progressive Change Institute, is a crowd-sourced platform allowing the public, leading policy experts, progressive organizations, celebrities, and others to submit and vote on big ideas they believe progressives should champion in 2015 and 2016.
- *Textizen’s web platform sends, receives, and analyzes text messages so you can reach the people you serve with the technology already in their pocket, 24/7. https://www.textizen.com/#section2
- *The town that runs on Twitter: Jun's residents tweet to report crime and chat to their mayor http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/features/the-town-that-runs-on-twitter-juns-residents-tweet-to-report-crime-and-chat-to-their-mayor-10248167.html
- *Steven Clift> This what my NGO does in Minnesota - for example my own neighborhood with 30% of the households (1400 people) participating: http://e-democracy.org/se
- *東京迂回路研究とは:http://www.diver-sion.org/tokyo/about/
- *Yenwei> 關於這種群體討論凝聚共識與解決方案的平台,IDEO新創公司IO Engine開發的openIDEO,社群有八萬人,結果會和IDEO的基金會行動連動,也有實體性的workshop。
- *新加坡
- *eCitizen - Launched in 1999, eCitizen is the first-stop portal for Government information and services, organised with your needs in mind. eCitizen pioneered the concept of providing cross-agency, citizen-centric information and services, to help you complete your transactions conveniently with ONE government.
- *Our Singapore Conversation Survey Findings - What are Singaporeans' priorities today and what do they hope for the future? We surveyed over 4,000 respondents in the Our Singapore Conversation (OSC) Survey to supplement what we were already hearing from Singaporeans at dialogues and online. Conducted by the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) in conjunction with the OSC Secretariat, the survey aimed to get a snapshot of Singaporeans' priorities, values and preferences. Housing, healthcare and job security were among the top areas of priority that Singaporeans hoped to see addressed today and they were also the same topics which resulted in the passionate discussions at OSC dialogues.
- *E-participation: Connecting Government and Citizens : Case Studies from Singapore
- *對話平台 Public Opinion - http://publicopinion.sg/hot
- *G1000 公民高峰會運動,召集民眾自行決定生活中有哪些重要的公共議題進行討論,G1000之後也在荷蘭數個城市延燒。
- *市長給問嗎? - http://wethepeople.tw/ (廣泛意見、公務系統無回應之義務)
-
-
- Tool / Project 數位工具應用於議題審議 /群眾決策 / 共識凝聚 / 市政決策
- *http://legislationlab.org/en/law/morocco-petition/
- *Bill Lab
- *https://github.com/clkao/billab
- *Billab.io -- collaborative bill writing (Grey Room Session 2 Wednesday)
- *https://www.facebook.com/govtrack/posts/10157945053815431
- *動民主
- *http://hack.g0v.tw/don-democracy
- *可結合土地議題的公眾決策協助
- *CoCall 一起播
- *專案簡介:打電話進去警廣報路況太麻煩了,不如變成 Voice Tweeter|專案三個字: NewsSpot TrafficReport MusicPlayer
- *pol.is
- *https://pol.is/inbox
- *Loomio
- *https://www.loomio.org/
- *The world needs a better way to make decisions together. Loomio is free and open source software for anyone, anywhere, to participate in decisions that affect them.
- *Insights
- *http://www.insights-us.com/
- *Insights helps leaders make smarter decisions by leveraging the insights of their stakeholders. Insights’ online consulting platform turns the wisdom of stakeholders into advice decision-makers can use. Its technology enables government agencies, businesses and non-profits to improve their outcomes and create partners for change. Innovative crowdsourcing algorithms allow users to perform most of the analytical tasks, relieving decision-makers from wading through tons of responses.
- *MASON
- *http://cs.gmu.edu/~eclab/projects/mason/
- *MASON is a fast discrete-event multiagent simulation library core in Java, designed to be the foundation for large custom-purpose Java simulations, and also to provide more than enough functionality for many lightweight simulation needs. MASON contains both a model library and an optional suite of visualization tools in 2D and 3D.
- *Airesis - Scegli di partecipare
- *http://airesis.us/
- *Airesis is a free software platform, built by a team of Italian developers and contributors, to enable communities and groups to organize themselves in a productive manner according to the principles of direct democracy and participation. To achieve this goal, the application has been designed as a multifunctional system, which integrates all the tools that can help the development of a community, in particular
- *Hipvote
- *http://www.hipvote.us/
- *對於法案的預先投票 app
- *Public Opinion
- *http://publicopinion.sg/hot
- *新加坡的公眾議題討論平台
- *Civic Eagle
- *http://www.civiceagle.com/who-we-are
- *PlatoForum
- *http://platoforum.herokuapp.com
- *Thumb
- *http://thumb.it/
- *Instant Opinions. Real People. Ask any question and get 50-100+ responses from real people instantly!
- *OpaVote
- *https://opavote.appspot.com
- *https://github.com/fork-the-law/hancock
- *Statistics about Internet Voting in Estonia
- *http://www.vvk.ee/voting-methods-in-estonia/engindex/statistics
- *I-voting was first introduced in the local elections of 2005, when more than 9 thousand voters cast their ballot via the Internet (this corresponded to about 2 per cent of all participating voters). Today, I-voting with binding results has been carried out seven times in Estonia: in the local elections in October 2005, the parliamentary elections in March 2007, the European Parliament elections in June 2009 and May 2014, the local elections in October 2009, the parliamentary elections in March 2011 and in the local elections in October 2013.
- *Seattle 市政預算線上遊戲
- *ParticipateDB 案例集:http://www.participatedb.com/projects - Projects are the place where the rubber hits the road, where tools are put to the test. In this section we list some of the more noteworthy projects of the past few years that best illustrate the various use cases for each tool.
+ \
|
||
| 2017-02-14 20:46 – 20:48 | r350 – r361 | |
顯示 diff(19 行未修改)
議題的共識凝聚與探討
*「城市對話」(stadsgesprek ,英譯為 City-wide conversation) 的公民參與實驗的推手,是烏特列支運輸、能源與環境副市長蘿特·范·何冬克 (Lot van Hooijdonk) 。而故事的起點,則是一個公民風力發電計畫引發的社會衝突。http://e-info.org.tw/node/116655
+ *MAS Summit 2015: The City We Want http://www.mas.org/
廣泛提議式的網路平台,讓公眾提出政策意見
(61 行未修改)
|
||
| 2017-01-10 17:53 – 17:53 | r333 – r349 | |
顯示 diff 群眾編審法律 / 政策共識凝聚 / 工具
-
+ 待分類
+ *法案 Open Sourcing https://c4t.hackpad.com/-Open-Sourcing-LK0TbSHeOX2
主題法規的先期審議與共識凝聚
(79 行未修改)
|
||
| 2017-01-07 17:32 – 17:32 | r330 – r332 | |
顯示 diff(40 行未修改)
*https://github.com/clkao/billab
*Billab.io -- collaborative bill writing (Grey Room Session 2 Wednesday)
+ *https://www.facebook.com/govtrack/posts/10157945053815431
*動民主
*http://hack.g0v.tw/don-democracy
(38 行未修改)
|
||
| 2016-12-20 09:14 | r329 | |
顯示 diff(41 行未修改)
*Billab.io -- collaborative bill writing (Grey Room Session 2 Wednesday)
*動民主
- *http://hack.g0v.tw/don-democracy
+ *http://hack.g0v.tw/don-democracy
*可結合土地議題的公眾決策協助
*CoCall 一起播
(36 行未修改)
|
||
| 2016-10-29 17:09 – 17:13 | r298 – r328 | |
顯示 diff 群眾編審法律 / 政策共識凝聚 / 工具
- Crowdsourced Law 群眾編審法律
- *主題法規的先期審議與共識凝聚
+ 主題法規的先期審議與共識凝聚
*群眾編審法律的文獻與案例
*RegulationRoom is an experimental platform for public participation in government rulemaking processes created by a cross-disciplinary group of Cornell researchers, the Cornell eRulemaking Initiative (CeRI). CeRI uses selected live rulemakings to experiment with human and computer support for public engagement and discussion. The ultimate goal of RegulationRoom is to provide guidance on design, technological, and human intervention strategies—grounded in theory and tested in practice—for effective Rulemaking 2.0 systems.
(10 行未修改)
*自經區正反方比較表:http://fepztw.github.io/
- *廣泛提議式的網路平台,讓公眾提出政策意見
+ 議題的共識凝聚與探討
+ *「城市對話」(stadsgesprek ,英譯為 City-wide conversation) 的公民參與實驗的推手,是烏特列支運輸、能源與環境副市長蘿特·范·何冬克 (Lot van Hooijdonk) 。而故事的起點,則是一個公民風力發電計畫引發的社會衝突。http://e-info.org.tw/node/116655
+
+ 廣泛提議式的網路平台,讓公眾提出政策意見
*The Big Ideas Project - Find Big Ideas and vote for the ones you support. The Big Ideas Project, launched in December 2014 by the Progressive Change Institute, is a crowd-sourced platform allowing the public, leading policy experts, progressive organizations, celebrities, and others to submit and vote on big ideas they believe progressives should champion in 2015 and 2016.
*Textizen’s web platform sends, receives, and analyzes text messages so you can reach the people you serve with the technology already in their pocket, 24/7. https://www.textizen.com/#section2
(7 行未修改)
*E-participation: Connecting Government and Citizens : Case Studies from Singapore
*對話平台 Public Opinion - http://publicopinion.sg/hot
+ *G1000 公民高峰會運動,召集民眾自行決定生活中有哪些重要的公共議題進行討論,G1000之後也在荷蘭數個城市延燒。
*市長給問嗎? - http://wethepeople.tw/ (廣泛意見、公務系統無回應之義務)
(46 行未修改)
|
||
| 2016-10-18 18:54 – 18:54 | r295 – r297 | |
顯示 diff(71 行未修改)
*OpaVote
*https://opavote.appspot.com
+ *https://github.com/fork-the-law/hancock
*Statistics about Internet Voting in Estonia
*http://www.vvk.ee/voting-methods-in-estonia/engindex/statistics
(3 行未修改)
|
||
| 2015-08-31 18:58 – 18:59 | r280 – r294 | |
顯示 diff(23 行未修改)
*Steven Clift> This what my NGO does in Minnesota - for example my own neighborhood with 30% of the households (1400 people) participating: http://e-democracy.org/se
*東京迂回路研究とは:http://www.diver-sion.org/tokyo/about/
+ *Yenwei> 關於這種群體討論凝聚共識與解決方案的平台,IDEO新創公司IO Engine開發的openIDEO,社群有八萬人,結果會和IDEO的基金會行動連動,也有實體性的workshop。
*新加坡
*eCitizen - Launched in 1999, eCitizen is the first-stop portal for Government information and services, organised with your needs in mind. eCitizen pioneered the concept of providing cross-agency, citizen-centric information and services, to help you complete your transactions conveniently with ONE government.
(50 行未修改)
|
||
| 2015-08-24 06:54 – 06:55 | r272 – r279 | |
顯示 diff(22 行未修改)
*The town that runs on Twitter: Jun's residents tweet to report crime and chat to their mayor http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/features/the-town-that-runs-on-twitter-juns-residents-tweet-to-report-crime-and-chat-to-their-mayor-10248167.html
*Steven Clift> This what my NGO does in Minnesota - for example my own neighborhood with 30% of the households (1400 people) participating: http://e-democracy.org/se
+ *東京迂回路研究とは:http://www.diver-sion.org/tokyo/about/
*新加坡
*eCitizen - Launched in 1999, eCitizen is the first-stop portal for Government information and services, organised with your needs in mind. eCitizen pioneered the concept of providing cross-agency, citizen-centric information and services, to help you complete your transactions conveniently with ONE government.
(50 行未修改)
|
||
| 2015-07-29 20:11 – 20:13 | r247 – r271 | |
顯示 diff- 群眾編審 / 共識凝聚 / 工具
+ 群眾編審法律 / 政策共識凝聚 / 工具
Crowdsourced Law 群眾編審法律
(16 行未修改)
*廣泛提議式的網路平台,讓公眾提出政策意見
*The Big Ideas Project - Find Big Ideas and vote for the ones you support. The Big Ideas Project, launched in December 2014 by the Progressive Change Institute, is a crowd-sourced platform allowing the public, leading policy experts, progressive organizations, celebrities, and others to submit and vote on big ideas they believe progressives should champion in 2015 and 2016.
+ *Textizen’s web platform sends, receives, and analyzes text messages so you can reach the people you serve with the technology already in their pocket, 24/7. https://www.textizen.com/#section2
+ *The town that runs on Twitter: Jun's residents tweet to report crime and chat to their mayor http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/features/the-town-that-runs-on-twitter-juns-residents-tweet-to-report-crime-and-chat-to-their-mayor-10248167.html
+ *Steven Clift> This what my NGO does in Minnesota - for example my own neighborhood with 30% of the households (1400 people) participating: http://e-democracy.org/se
*新加坡
*eCitizen - Launched in 1999, eCitizen is the first-stop portal for Government information and services, organised with your needs in mind. eCitizen pioneered the concept of providing cross-agency, citizen-centric information and services, to help you complete your transactions conveniently with ONE government.
(50 行未修改)
|
||
| 2015-05-19 12:28 – 12:28 | r244 – r246 | |
顯示 diff(28 行未修改)
Tool / Project 數位工具應用於議題審議 /群眾決策 / 共識凝聚 / 市政決策
+ *http://legislationlab.org/en/law/morocco-petition/
*Bill Lab
*https://github.com/clkao/billab
(40 行未修改)
|
||
| 2014-12-25 13:28 – 14:22 | r20 – r243 | |
顯示 diff- 議題審議/群眾決策/工具案例蒐集
+ 群眾編審 / 共識凝聚 / 工具
- *群眾編審法律的文獻與案例
+ Crowdsourced Law 群眾編審法律
+
*主題法規的先期審議與共識凝聚
+ *群眾編審法律的文獻與案例
*RegulationRoom is an experimental platform for public participation in government rulemaking processes created by a cross-disciplinary group of Cornell researchers, the Cornell eRulemaking Initiative (CeRI). CeRI uses selected live rulemakings to experiment with human and computer support for public engagement and discussion. The ultimate goal of RegulationRoom is to provide guidance on design, technological, and human intervention strategies—grounded in theory and tested in practice—for effective Rulemaking 2.0 systems.
+ *Rulemaking 2.0: Understanding and Getting Better Public Participation
+ *Farina, Cynthia R. and Newhart, Mary J., "Rulemaking 2.0: Understanding and Getting Better Public Participation" (2013). Cornell e-Rulemaking Initiative Publications. Paper 15. - http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/ceri/15
+ *Crowdsourcing in democracy: Crowdsourced Law Reform in Finland
+ *CROWDSOURCED OFF-ROAD TRAFFIC LAW EXPERIMENT IN FINLAND: Report about idea crowdsourcing and evaluation
*Fork the Law - https://github.com/fork-the-law/hancock
*Madison - http://opengovfoundation.org/the-madison-project
*https://github.com/opengovfoundation/madison
- *荷蘭還地於河(Room for the river) / 中文介紹 (摘錄) 荷蘭政府非常清楚,在初步提案階段就納入利益相關者包含公部門和地方居民的參與,是達到永續都市發展和河川治理的基礎。地區政府(上艾瑟爾省政府)整合中央部門(公共工程與水利管理署、交通運輸署)和地方政府(坎彭市政府)提案,並以協調者角色處理政府和居民意見的衝突,委託空間規劃顧問單位(NHS 景觀規劃事務所)辦理講座、工作坊協助公共政策達成與居民之間的共識,這是在民主社會有效推動計畫的要素之一。
+ *http://stjornlagarad.is/ / 群眾外包再創新:冰島人民用Facebook修訂憲法
+ *Seattle Citizen Initiatives, Referenda & Charter 市政倡議與公投機制
+ *vTaiwan
+ *自經區正反方比較表:http://fepztw.github.io/
+
*廣泛提議式的網路平台,讓公眾提出政策意見
*The Big Ideas Project - Find Big Ideas and vote for the ones you support. The Big Ideas Project, launched in December 2014 by the Progressive Change Institute, is a crowd-sourced platform allowing the public, leading policy experts, progressive organizations, celebrities, and others to submit and vote on big ideas they believe progressives should champion in 2015 and 2016.
(3 行未修改)
*E-participation: Connecting Government and Citizens : Case Studies from Singapore
*對話平台 Public Opinion - http://publicopinion.sg/hot
- *臺灣:
- *行政院法規線上諮詢系統 - https://vtw.link/ (參考 RegulationRoom)
*市長給問嗎? - http://wethepeople.tw/ (廣泛意見、公務系統無回應之義務)
- *行政程序法...?
- *
+
+
+ Tool / Project 數位工具應用於議題審議 /群眾決策 / 共識凝聚 / 市政決策
+ *Bill Lab
+ *https://github.com/clkao/billab
+ *Billab.io -- collaborative bill writing (Grey Room Session 2 Wednesday)
+ *動民主
+ *http://hack.g0v.tw/don-democracy
+ *可結合土地議題的公眾決策協助
+ *CoCall 一起播
+ *專案簡介:打電話進去警廣報路況太麻煩了,不如變成 Voice Tweeter|專案三個字: NewsSpot TrafficReport MusicPlayer
+ *pol.is
+ *https://pol.is/inbox
+ *Loomio
+ *https://www.loomio.org/
+ *The world needs a better way to make decisions together. Loomio is free and open source software for anyone, anywhere, to participate in decisions that affect them.
+ *Insights
+ *http://www.insights-us.com/
+ *Insights helps leaders make smarter decisions by leveraging the insights of their stakeholders. Insights’ online consulting platform turns the wisdom of stakeholders into advice decision-makers can use. Its technology enables government agencies, businesses and non-profits to improve their outcomes and create partners for change. Innovative crowdsourcing algorithms allow users to perform most of the analytical tasks, relieving decision-makers from wading through tons of responses.
+ *MASON
+ *http://cs.gmu.edu/~eclab/projects/mason/
+ *MASON is a fast discrete-event multiagent simulation library core in Java, designed to be the foundation for large custom-purpose Java simulations, and also to provide more than enough functionality for many lightweight simulation needs. MASON contains both a model library and an optional suite of visualization tools in 2D and 3D.
+ *Airesis - Scegli di partecipare
+ *http://airesis.us/
+ *Airesis is a free software platform, built by a team of Italian developers and contributors, to enable communities and groups to organize themselves in a productive manner according to the principles of direct democracy and participation. To achieve this goal, the application has been designed as a multifunctional system, which integrates all the tools that can help the development of a community, in particular
+ *Hipvote
+ *http://www.hipvote.us/
+ *對於法案的預先投票 app
+ *Public Opinion
+ *http://publicopinion.sg/hot
+ *新加坡的公眾議題討論平台
+ *Civic Eagle
+ *http://www.civiceagle.com/who-we-are
+ *PlatoForum
+ *http://platoforum.herokuapp.com
+ *Thumb
+ *http://thumb.it/
+ *Instant Opinions. Real People. Ask any question and get 50-100+ responses from real people instantly!
+ *OpaVote
+ *https://opavote.appspot.com
+ *Statistics about Internet Voting in Estonia
+ *http://www.vvk.ee/voting-methods-in-estonia/engindex/statistics
+ *I-voting was first introduced in the local elections of 2005, when more than 9 thousand voters cast their ballot via the Internet (this corresponded to about 2 per cent of all participating voters). Today, I-voting with binding results has been carried out seven times in Estonia: in the local elections in October 2005, the parliamentary elections in March 2007, the European Parliament elections in June 2009 and May 2014, the local elections in October 2009, the parliamentary elections in March 2011 and in the local elections in October 2013.
+ *Seattle 市政預算線上遊戲
+ *ParticipateDB 案例集:http://www.participatedb.com/projects - Projects are the place where the rubber hits the road, where tools are put to the test. In this section we list some of the more noteworthy projects of the past few years that best illustrate the various use cases for each tool.
|
||
| 2014-12-25 13:26 | r19 | |
顯示 diff(21 行未修改)
|
||
| 2014-12-25 13:25 – 13:26 | r6 – r18 | |
顯示 diff- 議題審議 /群眾決策 / 市政決策方法
-
- This pad text is synchronized as you type, so that everyone viewing this page sees the same text. This allows you to collaborate seamlessly on documents!
+ 議題審議/群眾決策/工具案例蒐集
- 數位工具應用於
+ *群眾編審法律的文獻與案例
+ *主題法規的先期審議與共識凝聚
+ *RegulationRoom is an experimental platform for public participation in government rulemaking processes created by a cross-disciplinary group of Cornell researchers, the Cornell eRulemaking Initiative (CeRI). CeRI uses selected live rulemakings to experiment with human and computer support for public engagement and discussion. The ultimate goal of RegulationRoom is to provide guidance on design, technological, and human intervention strategies—grounded in theory and tested in practice—for effective Rulemaking 2.0 systems.
+ *Fork the Law - https://github.com/fork-the-law/hancock
+ *Madison - http://opengovfoundation.org/the-madison-project
+ *https://github.com/opengovfoundation/madison
+ *荷蘭還地於河(Room for the river) / 中文介紹 (摘錄) 荷蘭政府非常清楚,在初步提案階段就納入利益相關者包含公部門和地方居民的參與,是達到永續都市發展和河川治理的基礎。地區政府(上艾瑟爾省政府)整合中央部門(公共工程與水利管理署、交通運輸署)和地方政府(坎彭市政府)提案,並以協調者角色處理政府和居民意見的衝突,委託空間規劃顧問單位(NHS 景觀規劃事務所)辦理講座、工作坊協助公共政策達成與居民之間的共識,這是在民主社會有效推動計畫的要素之一。
+ *廣泛提議式的網路平台,讓公眾提出政策意見
+ *The Big Ideas Project - Find Big Ideas and vote for the ones you support. The Big Ideas Project, launched in December 2014 by the Progressive Change Institute, is a crowd-sourced platform allowing the public, leading policy experts, progressive organizations, celebrities, and others to submit and vote on big ideas they believe progressives should champion in 2015 and 2016.
+ *新加坡
+ *eCitizen - Launched in 1999, eCitizen is the first-stop portal for Government information and services, organised with your needs in mind. eCitizen pioneered the concept of providing cross-agency, citizen-centric information and services, to help you complete your transactions conveniently with ONE government.
+ *Our Singapore Conversation Survey Findings - What are Singaporeans' priorities today and what do they hope for the future? We surveyed over 4,000 respondents in the Our Singapore Conversation (OSC) Survey to supplement what we were already hearing from Singaporeans at dialogues and online. Conducted by the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) in conjunction with the OSC Secretariat, the survey aimed to get a snapshot of Singaporeans' priorities, values and preferences. Housing, healthcare and job security were among the top areas of priority that Singaporeans hoped to see addressed today and they were also the same topics which resulted in the passionate discussions at OSC dialogues.
+ *E-participation: Connecting Government and Citizens : Case Studies from Singapore
+ *對話平台 Public Opinion - http://publicopinion.sg/hot
+ *臺灣:
+ *行政院法規線上諮詢系統 - https://vtw.link/ (參考 RegulationRoom)
+ *市長給問嗎? - http://wethepeople.tw/ (廣泛意見、公務系統無回應之義務)
+ *行政程序法...?
+ *
|
||
| 2014-12-25 13:25 | r5 | |
顯示 diff(5 行未修改)
|
||
| 2014-12-25 13:25 – 13:25 | r1 – r4 | |
顯示 diff- Untitled
+ 議題審議 /群眾決策 / 市政決策方法
This pad text is synchronized as you type, so that everyone viewing this page sees the same text. This allows you to collaborate seamlessly on documents!
+
+ 數位工具應用於
|
||
| 2014-12-25 13:24 | r0 | |
顯示 diff+ Untitled
+ This pad text is synchronized as you type, so that everyone viewing this page sees the same text. This allows you to collaborate seamlessly on documents!
|
||