R107 Sessions @ g0v summit 2014 unconference
編輯歷史
| 時間 | 作者 | 版本 |
|---|---|---|
| 2014-12-23 15:09 – 15:26 | r6028 – r6319 | |
顯示 diff（147 行未修改）
- *#6 16:30-17:10 主題 Topic:
- 現場直播網址 live url、錄影紀錄網址 video url、照片紀錄網址 photos url
+ *#6 16:30-17:10 主題 Topic: Lessons learned in financial transparency by Dutch governments
+ 現場直播網址 live url
+ *
+ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6vBHkfX2jQ&feature=youtu.be&t=7h15m51s
+ 錄影紀錄網址 video url、照片紀錄網址 photos url
參與者 Contributors: (請簽名 sign here)
- 發表者 Present by: (可不填 optional)
+ 發表者 Presented by: Breyten Ernsting (@breyten ) & Sicco van Sas (@siccovansas ) from Open State Foundation (NL)
討論內容 Discussions
- Lessons learned In financial transparancy
- Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
- [ Open Education ] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. [Open Culture] Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
- 0 artworks. Politwoops collect things spoken by politicians, usually stupid ones. Deleted tweets. Most of them are typos.
- Nowadays: Open spending, municipality budgets.
- Dutch Budget, Subsidy Tracker.
+ Lessons learned in financial transparency by Dutch governments.
- Open spending: Live demo. This is the Dutch version of the, you know the famous thing.
+ Since 2008, Open State Foundation. Like mySociety but smaller. Their main project themes are: Open Education, Open Culture, Open Health Care, Political Transparency, Politwoops... etc.
+ [ Open Education ] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. [Open Culture] Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 80
+ .0 artworks. Politwoops collects deleted tweets by politicians, usually stupid ones. Most of them are typos, but they also contain things they shouldn't have said.
+ I
+ n this presentation they talk about: OpOpen Spending municipality budgets), DuDutch Budget d SuSubsidy Tracker
- We started with municipalities, then progressed to otehr fields with the same data. They went quite far with 100+ municipalities.
+ pen spending: Live demo. This is the Dutch version of the, you know the famous thing.
+
+ We started with municipalities, then progressed to other fields with the same data. They went quite far with 100+ municipalities.
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each other in the same area. Differences across years can be shown. spending per capita for each type of expenditure is listed. So roterdam is spending more on social welfare, economic affairs, and such than Amsterdam. Rotterdam spends more on industry because it is a port, whereas Amsterdam is basically a tourist destination for British people ( laughs).
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each other in the same area. Differences across years can be shown. spending per capita for each type of expenditure is listed. So Rotterdam is spending more on social welfare, economic affairs, and such than Amsterdam. Rotterdam spends more on industry because it is a port, whereas Amsterdam is basically a tourist destination for British people ( lughs).
Question from Malaysian participant: Have you been checking
（5 行未修改）
They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they still don't like it. This absolves the government of responsibility so that they will keep giving the wrong files.
- They eventually get data from municipalities, but still get weird results. The guys wriging motions in municipalities responded by saying they will wait for half a year. After some negotiation this gets reduced to a month.
+ They eventually get data from municipalities, but still get weird results. The guys writing motions in municipalities responded by saying they will wait for half a year. After some negotiation this gets reduced to a month.
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
（1 行未修改）
We try to do it in a nice way. So that they would like to work with us.
- Question from Engels(Pirate Party): Do you ask about previous budget, or the background accounding data behind the data.
+ Question from Engels(P irate Party): Do you ask about previous budget, or the background accounting data behind the data.
A: Only the files sent to the statistics bureau. Files they already have. next question: are they structured int eh same way? because this would affect comparison. Otherwise this will take a lot of work to categorize.
（1 行未修改）
Q: does the budget need to be approved by the congress?
- yes, national level. BUdget usually comes in April. They show Budget and Realization. On national level there is an additional level of pre-approved and executed budget.
+ yes, national level. Budget usually comes in April. They show Budget and Realization. On national level there is an additional level of pre-approved and executed budget.
Q: the statistic bureau collect the data but publish only aggregates. They don't have copyright of it, so cannot publish details.
- LIve demo of treemap Budget. Currently only 2 levels deep. Will be deeper. The website is copied from Solomon Kahn, US national budget visualized for the last 40 years with inflation adjusted info..
+ Live demo of treemap Budget. Currently only 2 levels deep. Will be deeper. The website is copied from Solomon Kahn, US national budget visualized for the last 40 years with inflation adjusted info..
Compare: tw budget g0v.
（4 行未修改）
Simple website built by CEO, which is fine for the programmer (LOL). They emailed all the ministers that do you have subsidy data? Most reply. Now they can stuff this with much more data. Also provincial data available. Did not spend much time to build it. Technical universities were called to ministries and reprimanded because they are found out to have taken subsidies from other organizations. They get asked what the hell are you doing XDDD
- Q: about budget in TW. Was it easy for g0v project to get the data? The data is from Central government. But they do not have detail. Only aggregate data. ONly on high levels. What about municipalities?
+ Q: about budget in TW. Was it easy for g0v project to get the data? The data is from Central government. But they do not have detail. Only aggregate data. Only on high levels. What about municipalities?
For city level we do not have ability to extract that information yet. Right now is election time, there is resistance in government. We can know about who suggested spending in each government.
（2 行未修改）
German experience: the parliament member demanded excel files. The answer is that they accounting software cannot putout it. The administration does not like to have easy data. like to keep it complicated.
- New Zealand: jounrnalist like find scandals, after he did the j總結 Conclusions
+ New Zealand: journalist like find scandals, after he did the j總結 Conclusions
(海報照片 photo of your poster)
|
||
| 2014-11-12 18:54 – 18:54 | r6019 – r6027 | |
顯示 diff（4 行未修改）
*#2 11:35 - 12:15 主題 Topic: Negotiations
- 現場直播網址 live url、錄影紀錄網址 video url、照片紀錄網址 photos url
+ 現場直播網址 live http://youtu.be/V6vBHkfX2jQ?t=2h22m51s
+ 錄影紀錄網址 video url、照片紀錄網址 photos url
參與者 Contributors: (請簽名 sign here)
發表者 Present by: David Eaves (@deaves)
（201 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 13:54 – 13:54 | r6017 – r6018 | |
顯示 diff（19 行未修改）
Different groups stabilise in different quadrants, the aim is to stabilise in the upper right quadrant, where you can be confident that a relationship is strong enough to withstand any substance. When you're operating in that quadrant, you'd never call it a negotiation. Calling something a 'negotiation' is a symbol that you have predetermined that it is likely to go wrong. It sets you up for failure.
- Exercise: people pair up, no talking, given partial rules of a game, 10 seconds to earn points. People recognise the game as 'arm wrestling', but it is never explicitly named, and yet we still bring the default behaviours of arm wrestling with us.
+ Exercise: people pair up, no talking, given partial rules of a game, 10 seconds to earn points. People recognize the game as 'arm wrestling', but it is never explicitly named, and yet we still bring the default behaviours of arm wrestling with us.
- The same goes for negotiation, we have partial rules and default behaviours. The only solution is to find an effective means of communication. (Consequently power accumulates in those that are most effective communicators.)
+ The same goes for negotiation, we have partial rules and default behaviors. The only solution is to find an effective means of communication. (Consequently power accumulates in those that are most effective communicators.)
A common pattern in conflict resolution is "I did something nice to them last week and they spat on us, now it is all on them to make reparations." It may take 2 or 3 attempts at concession before the notion is effectively transmitted, as the first response you got was just a reflex.
（184 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 09:17 – 09:17 | r6010 – r6016 | |
顯示 diff（204 行未修改）
From loomio guy: Chewydata.com/budget2013.html
- 總結 Conclusions
+ German experience: the parliament member demanded excel files. The answer is that they accounting software cannot putout it. The administration does not like to have easy data. like to keep it complicated.
+
+ New Zealand: jounrnalist like find scandals, after he did the j總結 Conclusions
(海報照片 photo of your poster)
|
||
| 2014-11-09 09:13 | r6009 | |
顯示 diff（202 行未修改）
For city level we do not have ability to extract that information yet. Right now is election time, there is resistance in government. We can know about who suggested spending in each government.
- From loomio guy: Chewydata.com/budget2
- 13.html
+ From loomio guy: Chewydata.com/budget2013.html
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 09:10 – 09:13 | r5725 – r6008 | |
顯示 diff（197 行未修改）
New project: Subsidy Tracker
- Simple website built by CEO, which is fine for the programmer (LOL). They emailed all the ministers that do you
+ Simple website built by CEO, which is fine for the programmer (LOL). They emailed all the ministers that do you have subsidy data? Most reply. Now they can stuff this with much more data. Also provincial data available. Did not spend much time to build it. Technical universities were called to ministries and reprimanded because they are found out to have taken subsidies from other organizations. They get asked what the hell are you doing XDDD
+
+ Q: about budget in TW. Was it easy for g0v project to get the data? The data is from Central government. But they do not have detail. Only aggregate data. ONly on high levels. What about municipalities?
+ For city level we do not have ability to extract that information yet. Right now is election time, there is resistance in government. We can know about who suggested spending in each government.
+
+ From loomio guy: Chewydata.com/budget2
+ 13.html
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 09:10 | r5724 | |
顯示 diff（203 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 09:06 – 09:10 | r5508 – r5723 | |
顯示 diff（193 行未修改）
Compare: tw budget g0v.
+
+ Easy work: Code already on github. Data is already available. Found the right guy in government. During the process found problems in the data. he guy in government fixes the problem. There are still good guys in governments. He is also happy because the data gets used. The guy is in the information department. he sees the use of data by Open spending as a reason to get data from other departments. data only 4years now. Previous sites use different structure.
+ New project: Subsidy Tracker
+ Simple website built by CEO, which is fine for the programmer (LOL). They emailed all the ministers that do you
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 09:06 | r5507 | |
顯示 diff（199 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 09:00 – 09:06 | r5179 – r5506 | |
顯示 diff（180 行未修改）
We try to do it in a nice way. So that they would like to work with us.
- Q: Do you ask about previous budget, or the background accounding data behind the data.
- A: Only the fiels sent to the statistics bureau. Files they already have. next question: are they structured int eh same way? because this would affect comparison. Otherwise this will take a lot of work to categorize.
+ Question from Engels(Pirate Party): Do you ask about previous budget, or the background accounding data behind the data.
+ A: Only the files sent to the statistics bureau. Files they already have. next question: are they structured int eh same way? because this would affect comparison. Otherwise this will take a lot of work to categorize.
+
+ Still they have 400 municipalities in Netherlands, but need to contact each and everyone of them. In German state of Hessel: 1600 municipalities. There is an API, even if not well documented, people can download it. A commercial company used this to provide information to municipalities.
+
+ Q: does the budget need to be approved by the congress?
+ yes, national level. BUdget usually comes in April. They show Budget and Realization. On national level there is an additional level of pre-approved and executed budget.
+
+ Q: the statistic bureau collect the data but publish only aggregates. They don't have copyright of it, so cannot publish details.
+
+ LIve demo of treemap Budget. Currently only 2 levels deep. Will be deeper. The website is copied from Solomon Kahn, US national budget visualized for the last 40 years with inflation adjusted info..
+ Compare: tw budget g0v.
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 09:00 – 09:00 | r5176 – r5178 | |
顯示 diff（180 行未修改）
We try to do it in a nice way. So that they would like to work with us.
- Q: Do you ask about previous budget, or the background accounding data behind the data. Only the fiels sent to the statistics bureau. Files they already have. next question: are they structured int eh same way? because this would affect comparison. Otherwise this will take a lot of work to categorize.
+ Q: Do you ask about previous budget, or the background accounding data behind the data.
+ A: Only the fiels sent to the statistics bureau. Files they already have. next question: are they structured int eh same way? because this would affect comparison. Otherwise this will take a lot of work to categorize.
（3 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 – 09:00 | r5074 – r5175 | |
顯示 diff（179 行未修改）
The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request.
We try to do it in a nice way. So that they would like to work with us.
-
+ Q: Do you ask about previous budget, or the background accounding data behind the data. Only the fiels sent to the statistics bureau. Files they already have. next question: are they structured int eh same way? because this would affect comparison. Otherwise this will take a lot of work to categorize.
（3 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 – 08:59 | r5070 – r5073 | |
顯示 diff（178 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request.
- We try to do it in a nice way. So that they would like to
+ We try to do it in a nice way. So that they would like to work with us.
（5 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 | r5069 | |
顯示 diff（177 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
- The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request
+ The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request.
We try to do it in a nice way. So that they would like to
（6 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 | r5068 | |
顯示 diff（178 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request
- We try to do it in a nice way. So that they would like
+ We try to do it in a nice way. So that they would like to
（5 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 | r5067 | |
顯示 diff（177 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
- The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request,
+ The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request
We try to do it in a nice way. So that they would like
（6 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 | r5066 | |
顯示 diff（178 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request,
- We try to do it in a nice way. So that they would li
+ We try to do it in a nice way. So that they would like
（5 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 | r5065 | |
顯示 diff（177 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
- The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request,
+ The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request,
We try to do it in a nice way. So that they would li
（6 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 | r5064 | |
顯示 diff（178 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request,
- We try to do it in a nice way. So that they would
+ We try to do it in a nice way. So that they would li
（5 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 | r5063 | |
顯示 diff（177 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
- The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but
+ The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request,
We try to do it in a nice way. So that they would
（6 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 | r5062 | |
顯示 diff（178 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but
- We try to do it in a nice way. So that they would
+ We try to do it in a nice way. So that they would
（5 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 | r5061 | |
顯示 diff（177 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
- The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but
+ The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but
We try to do it in a nice way. So that they would
（6 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 | r5060 | |
顯示 diff（178 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but
- We try to do it in a nice way. So that they wo
+ We try to do it in a nice way. So that they would
（5 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 | r5059 | |
顯示 diff（177 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
- The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but phr
+ The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but
We try to do it in a nice way. So that they wo
（6 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 | r5058 | |
顯示 diff（178 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but phr
- We try to do it in a nice way. So that the
+ We try to do it in a nice way. So that they wo
（5 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 | r5057 | |
顯示 diff（177 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
- The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but phrase
+ The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but phr
We try to do it in a nice way. So that the
（6 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 | r5056 | |
顯示 diff（178 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but phrase
- We try to do it in a nice way. So that
+ We try to do it in a nice way. So that the
（5 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 | r5055 | |
顯示 diff（177 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
- The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but phrase it
+ The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but phrase
We try to do it in a nice way. So that
（6 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 | r5054 | |
顯示 diff（178 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but phrase it
- We try to do it in a nice way. So that wh
+ We try to do it in a nice way. So that
（5 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 | r5053 | |
顯示 diff（177 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
- The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but phrase it
+ The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but phrase it
We try to do it in a nice way. So that wh
（6 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 – 08:59 | r5044 – r5052 | |
顯示 diff（178 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but phrase it
- We try to do it i
+ We try to do it in a nice way. So that wh
（5 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 | r5043 | |
顯示 diff（177 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
- The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but phrase
+ The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but phrase it
We try to do it i
（6 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 | r5042 | |
顯示 diff（178 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but phrase
- We try to do it
+ We try to do it i
（5 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 | r5041 | |
顯示 diff（177 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
- The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but phra
+ The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but phrase
We try to do it
（6 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 | r5040 | |
顯示 diff（178 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but phra
- We try to do
+ We try to do it
（5 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 | r5039 | |
顯示 diff（177 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
- The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but ph
+ The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but phra
We try to do
（6 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 | r5038 | |
顯示 diff（178 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but ph
- We try
+ We try to do
（5 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 | r5037 | |
顯示 diff（177 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
- The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but p
+ The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but ph
We try
（6 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 | r5036 | |
顯示 diff（178 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but p
- We t
+ We try
（5 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 | r5035 | |
顯示 diff（177 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
- The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but
+ The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but p
We t
（6 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:59 – 08:59 | r5032 – r5034 | |
顯示 diff（178 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but
-
+ We t
（5 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:58 – 08:59 | r5020 – r5031 | |
顯示 diff（177 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
- The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freed
+ The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freedom of information request, but
（6 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:58 | r5019 | |
顯示 diff（178 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freed
+
+
+
（3 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:58 – 08:58 | r5016 – r5018 | |
顯示 diff（177 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
- The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as FO
+ The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as freed
（3 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:58 | r5015 | |
顯示 diff（178 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as FO
+
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:58 | r5014 | |
顯示 diff（177 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
- The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as FOI
+ The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as FO
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:58 | r5013 | |
顯示 diff（178 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as FOI
+
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:58 – 08:58 | r5006 – r5012 | |
顯示 diff（177 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
- The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also
+ The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also frame it not as FOI
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:58 | r5005 | |
顯示 diff（176 行未修改）
They eventually get data from municipalities, but still get weird results. The guys wriging motions in municipalities responded by saying they will wait for half a year. After some negotiation this gets reduced to a month.
- Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government
+ Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government?
The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:58 – 08:58 | r5003 – r5004 | |
顯示 diff（177 行未修改）
Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government
- The argument is that civilians think it is important.
+ The argument is that civilians think it is important. Also
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:58 – 08:58 | r5001 – r5002 | |
顯示 diff（176 行未修改）
They eventually get data from municipalities, but still get weird results. The guys wriging motions in municipalities responded by saying they will wait for half a year. After some negotiation this gets reduced to a month.
- Question: What's your augumentation when you write to the government
+ Question: What's your argumentation when you write to the government
The argument is that civilians think it is important.
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:58 – 08:58 | r4995 – r5000 | |
顯示 diff（177 行未修改）
Question: What's your augumentation when you write to the government
- The argument is that civilia
+ The argument is that civilians think it is important.
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:58 | r4994 | |
顯示 diff（176 行未修改）
They eventually get data from municipalities, but still get weird results. The guys wriging motions in municipalities responded by saying they will wait for half a year. After some negotiation this gets reduced to a month.
- Question: What's your augmentation when you write to the government
+ Question: What's your augumentation when you write to the government
The argument is that civilia
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:58 | r4993 | |
顯示 diff（177 行未修改）
Question: What's your augmentation when you write to the government
- The argument is that ci
+ The argument is that civilia
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:58 | r4992 | |
顯示 diff（176 行未修改）
They eventually get data from municipalities, but still get weird results. The guys wriging motions in municipalities responded by saying they will wait for half a year. After some negotiation this gets reduced to a month.
- Question: What's your augamentation when you write to the government
+ Question: What's your augmentation when you write to the government
The argument is that ci
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:58 – 08:58 | r4989 – r4991 | |
顯示 diff（177 行未修改）
Question: What's your augamentation when you write to the government
- The argum
+ The argument is that ci
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:58 | r4988 | |
顯示 diff（176 行未修改）
They eventually get data from municipalities, but still get weird results. The guys wriging motions in municipalities responded by saying they will wait for half a year. After some negotiation this gets reduced to a month.
- Question: Wht's your augamentation when you write to the government
+ Question: What's your augamentation when you write to the government
The argum
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:58 – 08:58 | r4986 – r4987 | |
顯示 diff（177 行未修改）
Question: Wht's your augamentation when you write to the government
- The a
+ The argum
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:58 | r4985 | |
顯示 diff（176 行未修改）
They eventually get data from municipalities, but still get weird results. The guys wriging motions in municipalities responded by saying they will wait for half a year. After some negotiation this gets reduced to a month.
- Question: Waht's your augamentation when you write to the government
+ Question: Wht's your augamentation when you write to the government
The a
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:58 – 08:58 | r4982 – r4984 | |
顯示 diff（177 行未修改）
Question: Waht's your augamentation when you write to the government
- The argument
+ The a
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:58 – 08:58 | r4979 – r4981 | |
顯示 diff（176 行未修改）
They eventually get data from municipalities, but still get weird results. The guys wriging motions in municipalities responded by saying they will wait for half a year. After some negotiation this gets reduced to a month.
- Question: Waht's your augamentation when you write to the go
+ Question: Waht's your augamentation when you write to the government
The argument
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:58 | r4978 | |
顯示 diff（177 行未修改）
Question: Waht's your augamentation when you write to the go
- The argu
+ The argument
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:58 | r4977 | |
顯示 diff（176 行未修改）
They eventually get data from municipalities, but still get weird results. The guys wriging motions in municipalities responded by saying they will wait for half a year. After some negotiation this gets reduced to a month.
- Question: Waht's your augamentation when you write to the
+ Question: Waht's your augamentation when you write to the go
The argu
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:58 | r4976 | |
顯示 diff（177 行未修改）
Question: Waht's your augamentation when you write to the
- The a
+ The argu
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:58 | r4975 | |
顯示 diff（176 行未修改）
They eventually get data from municipalities, but still get weird results. The guys wriging motions in municipalities responded by saying they will wait for half a year. After some negotiation this gets reduced to a month.
- Question: Waht's your augamentation when you write to
+ Question: Waht's your augamentation when you write to the
The a
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:58 | r4974 | |
顯示 diff（177 行未修改）
Question: Waht's your augamentation when you write to
- T
+ The a
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:58 | r4973 | |
顯示 diff（176 行未修改）
They eventually get data from municipalities, but still get weird results. The guys wriging motions in municipalities responded by saying they will wait for half a year. After some negotiation this gets reduced to a month.
- Question: Waht's your augamentation when you wri
+ Question: Waht's your augamentation when you write to
T
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:58 | r4972 | |
顯示 diff（177 行未修改）
Question: Waht's your augamentation when you wri
-
+ T
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:58 – 08:58 | r4957 – r4971 | |
顯示 diff（176 行未修改）
They eventually get data from municipalities, but still get weird results. The guys wriging motions in municipalities responded by saying they will wait for half a year. After some negotiation this gets reduced to a month.
- Question:
+ Question: Waht's your augamentation when you wri
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 – 08:58 | r4849 – r4956 | |
顯示 diff（170 行未修改）
Getting the data was basically keep calling and contacting the government.
- Question: Did you get data in a machine readbale format?
+ Question: Did you get data in a machine readable format?
- They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they still don't like it. This
+ They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they still don't like it. This absolves the government of responsibility so that they will keep giving the wrong files.
+ They eventually get data from municipalities, but still get weird results. The guys wriging motions in municipalities responded by saying they will wait for half a year. After some negotiation this gets reduced to a month.
+ Question:
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4848 | |
顯示 diff（174 行未修改）
They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they still don't like it. This
- WE don't want to parse data back
+
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 – 08:56 | r4842 – r4847 | |
顯示 diff（172 行未修改）
Question: Did you get data in a machine readbale format?
- They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they still don't like it.
+ They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they still don't like it. This
WE don't want to parse data back
（4 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4841 | |
顯示 diff（174 行未修改）
They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they still don't like it.
- WE don't want to parse data bac
+ WE don't want to parse data back
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4840 | |
顯示 diff（172 行未修改）
Question: Did you get data in a machine readbale format?
- They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they still don't like
+ They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they still don't like it.
WE don't want to parse data bac
（4 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4839 | |
顯示 diff（174 行未修改）
They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they still don't like
- WE don't want to parse data ba
+ WE don't want to parse data bac
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4838 | |
顯示 diff（172 行未修改）
Question: Did you get data in a machine readbale format?
- They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they still don't l
+ They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they still don't like
WE don't want to parse data ba
（4 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4837 | |
顯示 diff（174 行未修改）
They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they still don't l
- WE don't want to parse data
+ WE don't want to parse data ba
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4836 | |
顯示 diff（172 行未修改）
Question: Did you get data in a machine readbale format?
- They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they still don't
+ They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they still don't l
WE don't want to parse data
（4 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 – 08:56 | r4833 – r4835 | |
顯示 diff（174 行未修改）
They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they still don't
- WE don't want to par
+ WE don't want to parse data
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4832 | |
顯示 diff（172 行未修改）
Question: Did you get data in a machine readbale format?
- They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they still don't
+ They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they still don't
WE don't want to par
（4 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4831 | |
顯示 diff（174 行未修改）
They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they still don't
- WE don't want to
+ WE don't want to par
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4830 | |
顯示 diff（172 行未修改）
Question: Did you get data in a machine readbale format?
- They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they still don
+ They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they still don't
WE don't want to
（4 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4829 | |
顯示 diff（174 行未修改）
They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they still don
- WE don't want
+ WE don't want to
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4828 | |
顯示 diff（172 行未修改）
Question: Did you get data in a machine readbale format?
- They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they still d
+ They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they still don
WE don't want
（4 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4827 | |
顯示 diff（174 行未修改）
They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they still d
- WE don't w
+ WE don't want
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4826 | |
顯示 diff（172 行未修改）
Question: Did you get data in a machine readbale format?
- They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they stil
+ They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they still d
WE don't w
（4 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4825 | |
顯示 diff（174 行未修改）
They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they stil
- WE don't
+ WE don't w
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4824 | |
顯示 diff（172 行未修改）
Question: Did you get data in a machine readbale format?
- They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they
+ They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they stil
WE don't
（4 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4823 | |
顯示 diff（174 行未修改）
They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they
- WE don
+ WE don't
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4822 | |
顯示 diff（172 行未修改）
Question: Did you get data in a machine readbale format?
- They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But
+ They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But they
WE don
（4 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4821 | |
顯示 diff（174 行未修改）
They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But
- W
+ WE don
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4820 | |
顯示 diff（172 行未修改）
Question: Did you get data in a machine readbale format?
- They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back.
+ They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back. But
W
（4 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4819 | |
顯示 diff（173 行未修改）
They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back.
-
+ W
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 – 08:56 | r4791 – r4818 | |
顯示 diff（171 行未修改）
Question: Did you get data in a machine readbale format?
-
+ They usually send PDF files. Printed out excel , easy to parse back.
（4 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 – 08:56 | r4789 – r4790 | |
顯示 diff（171 行未修改）
Question: Did you get data in a machine readbale format?
+
+
+
+
+
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4788 | |
顯示 diff（170 行未修改）
Getting the data was basically keep calling and contacting the government.
- Question:Did you get data in a machine readbale format?
+ Question: Did you get data in a machine readbale format?
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4787 | |
顯示 diff（171 行未修改）
Question:Did you get data in a machine readbale format?
+
總結 Conclusions
(海報照片 photo of your poster)
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 – 08:56 | r4783 – r4786 | |
顯示 diff（170 行未修改）
Getting the data was basically keep calling and contacting the government.
- QusDid you get data in a machine readbale format?
+ Question:Did you get data in a machine readbale format?
總結 Conclusions
(海報照片 photo of your poster)
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 – 08:56 | r4780 – r4782 | |
顯示 diff（170 行未修改）
Getting the data was basically keep calling and contacting the government.
- QusDid you get data in a machine readbale
+ QusDid you get data in a machine readbale format?
總結 Conclusions
(海報照片 photo of your poster)
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4779 | |
顯示 diff（170 行未修改）
Getting the data was basically keep calling and contacting the government.
- QDid you get data in a machine readbale
+ QusDid you get data in a machine readbale
總結 Conclusions
(海報照片 photo of your poster)
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4778 | |
顯示 diff（170 行未修改）
Getting the data was basically keep calling and contacting the government.
- QDid you get data in a machine readbale
+ QDid you get data in a machine readbale
總結 Conclusions
(海報照片 photo of your poster)
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4777 | |
顯示 diff（170 行未修改）
Getting the data was basically keep calling and contacting the government.
- Did you get data in a machine readbale
+ QDid you get data in a machine readbale
總結 Conclusions
(海報照片 photo of your poster)
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4776 | |
顯示 diff（170 行未修改）
Getting the data was basically keep calling and contacting the government.
- Did you get data in a machine read
+ Did you get data in a machine readbale
總結 Conclusions
(海報照片 photo of your poster)
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4775 | |
顯示 diff（170 行未修改）
Getting the data was basically keep calling and contacting the government.
- DQid you get data in a machine read
+ Did you get data in a machine read
總結 Conclusions
(海報照片 photo of your poster)
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4774 | |
顯示 diff（170 行未修改）
Getting the data was basically keep calling and contacting the government.
- DQid you get data in a machine rea
+ DQid you get data in a machine read
總結 Conclusions
(海報照片 photo of your poster)
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:56 | r4773 | |
顯示 diff（170 行未修改）
Getting the data was basically keep calling and contacting the government.
- DQ=id you get data in a machine rea
+ DQid you get data in a machine rea
總結 Conclusions
(海報照片 photo of your poster)
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:55 – 08:56 | r4767 – r4772 | |
顯示 diff（170 行未修改）
Getting the data was basically keep calling and contacting the government.
- DQ=id you get dat
+ DQ=id you get data in a machine rea
總結 Conclusions
(海報照片 photo of your poster)
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:55 | r4766 | |
顯示 diff（170 行未修改）
Getting the data was basically keep calling and contacting the government.
- DQid you get dat
+ DQ=id you get dat
總結 Conclusions
(海報照片 photo of your poster)
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:55 – 08:55 | r4761 – r4765 | |
顯示 diff（170 行未修改）
Getting the data was basically keep calling and contacting the government.
- DQ
+ DQid you get dat
總結 Conclusions
(海報照片 photo of your poster)
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:55 | r4760 | |
顯示 diff（170 行未修改）
Getting the data was basically keep calling and contacting the government.
- D
+ DQ
總結 Conclusions
(海報照片 photo of your poster)
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:54 – 08:55 | r4725 – r4759 | |
顯示 diff（167 行未修改）
Question from Malaysian participant: Have you been checking
-
+ Getting the data was basically keep calling and contacting the government.
+ D
總結 Conclusions
(海報照片 photo of your poster)
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:52 – 08:54 | r4581 – r4724 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each other in the same area. Differences across years can be shown.
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each other in the same area. Differences across years can be shown. spending per capita for each type of expenditure is listed. So roterdam is spending more on social welfare, economic affairs, and such than Amsterdam. Rotterdam spends more on industry because it is a port, whereas Amsterdam is basically a tourist destination for British people ( laughs).
+
+ Question from Malaysian participant: Have you been checking
+
+
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:52 | r4580 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shrinking budget/Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each other in the same area. Differences across years can be shown.
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each other in the same area. Differences across years can be shown.
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:52 – 08:52 | r4558 – r4579 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shrinking budget/Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each other in the same area.
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shrinking budget/Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each other in the same area. Differences across years can be shown.
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 – 08:51 | r4556 – r4557 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shrinking /Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each other in the same area.
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shrinking budget/Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each other in the same area.
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4555 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shrinking /Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each other in the same area
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shrinking /Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each other in the same area.
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4554 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shrinking/Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each other in the same area
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shrinking /Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each other in the same area
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4553 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shrinking/Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each other in the same
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shrinking/Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each other in the same area
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4552 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shrink/Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each other in the same
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shrinking/Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each other in the same
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4551 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shrink/Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each other in th
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shrink/Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each other in the same
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4550 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shri/Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each other in th
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shrink/Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each other in th
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4549 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shri/Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each other
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shri/Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each other in th
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4548 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shr/Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each other
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shri/Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each other
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4547 | |
顯示 diff（170 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4546 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: /Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each other
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shr/Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each other
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4545 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: /Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each ot
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: /Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each other
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4544 | |
顯示 diff（170 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 – 08:51 | r4534 – r4543 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: /Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among m
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: /Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among municipalities close to each ot
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4533 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green:/Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among m
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: /Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among m
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4532 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green:/Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green:/Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among m
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4531 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green/Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green:/Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 – 08:51 | r4528 – r4530 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green/Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green/Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 among
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4527 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green/Ble: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green/Blue: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4526 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green/Ble: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 w
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green/Ble: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4525 | |
顯示 diff（170 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 – 08:51 | r4522 – r4524 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green/Ble: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 with
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green/Ble: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 w
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 – 08:51 | r4509 – r4521 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green/The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 with
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green/Ble: expanding budget]The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 with
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4508 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green/The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 w
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green/The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 with
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4507 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [GreenThe Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 w
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green/The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 w
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4506 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [GreenThe Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 201
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [GreenThe Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2012 w
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4505 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green:The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 201
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [GreenThe Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 201
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 – 08:51 | r4503 – r4504 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green:The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 200
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green:The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 201
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4502 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 200
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green:The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 200
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4501 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 200
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4500 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: sThe Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4499 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: sThe Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: sThe Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing 2
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4498 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shrThe Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: sThe Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4497 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shrThe Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Compa
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shrThe Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Comparing
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4496 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shriThe Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Compa
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shrThe Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Compa
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 – 08:51 | r4494 – r4495 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shriThe Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared.
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shriThe Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared. Compa
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 – 08:51 | r4489 – r4493 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [GreeThe Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared.
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [Green: shriThe Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared.
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4488 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [GreeThe Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [GreeThe Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared.
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4487 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [GreThe Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [GreeThe Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4486 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [GreThe Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compar
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [GreThe Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compared
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4485 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [GThe Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compar
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [GreThe Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compar
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4484 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [GThe Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [GThe Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be compar
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4483 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [GThe Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 – 08:51 | r4480 – r4482 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that they can be
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:51 | r4479 | |
顯示 diff（164 行未修改）
10 main categories
Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
- Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. [The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:49 – 08:51 | r4356 – r4478 | |
顯示 diff（162 行未修改）
We started with municipalities, then progressed to otehr fields with the same data. They went quite far with 100+ municipalities.
- 10 main categories.
-
-
+ 10 main categories
+ Amsterdam has 6 billion Euro yearly budget. Visualizes the different expenditures.
+ Both expected revenue and expected expenditures. The Aldermen did not like coloring expenses as red. So they use blue now. They normalized the money in Euro or for the amount per person was being spent. All standardized so that
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:49 – 08:49 | r4349 – r4355 | |
顯示 diff（162 行未修改）
We started with municipalities, then progressed to otehr fields with the same data. They went quite far with 100+ municipalities.
-
+ 10 main categories.
（3 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:48 – 08:49 | r4310 – r4348 | |
顯示 diff（161 行未修改）
Open spending: Live demo. This is the Dutch version of the, you know the famous thing.
- We started with
+ We started with municipalities, then progressed to otehr fields with the same data. They went quite far with 100+ municipalities.
（4 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:48 | r4309 | |
顯示 diff（159 行未修改）
Dutch Budget, Subsidy Tracker.
- Open spending: Live demo. This is the Dutch version of the you know the famous thing.
+ Open spending: Live demo. This is the Dutch version of the, you know the famous thing.
We started with
（6 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:48 – 08:48 | r4304 – r4308 | |
顯示 diff（160 行未修改）
Open spending: Live demo. This is the Dutch version of the you know the famous thing.
-
+ We started with
（4 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:48 – 08:48 | r4300 – r4303 | |
顯示 diff（159 行未修改）
Dutch Budget, Subsidy Tracker.
- Open spending: Live demo. This is the Dutch version of the you know the
+ Open spending: Live demo. This is the Dutch version of the you know the famous thing.
（6 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:48 | r4299 | |
顯示 diff（159 行未修改）
Dutch Budget, Subsidy Tracker.
- Open spending: Live ddemo. This is the Dutch version of the you know the
+ Open spending: Live demo. This is the Dutch version of the you know the
（6 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:48 – 08:48 | r4290 – r4298 | |
顯示 diff（159 行未修改）
Dutch Budget, Subsidy Tracker.
- Open spending: Live ddemo. This is the Du
+ Open spending: Live ddemo. This is the Dutch version of the you know the
（6 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:48 | r4289 | |
顯示 diff（159 行未修改）
Dutch Budget, Subsidy Tracker.
- Open spending: Live ddemo. This is the Dus
+ Open spending: Live ddemo. This is the Du
（6 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:48 – 08:48 | r4287 – r4288 | |
顯示 diff（159 行未修改）
Dutch Budget, Subsidy Tracker.
- Open spending: Live ddemo. This is the s
+ Open spending: Live ddemo. This is the Dus
（6 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:47 – 08:48 | r4263 – r4286 | |
顯示 diff（157 行未修改）
0 artworks. Politwoops collect things spoken by politicians, usually stupid ones. Deleted tweets. Most of them are typos.
Nowadays: Open spending, municipality budgets.
- Dutch
+ Dutch Budget, Subsidy Tracker.
+
+ Open spending: Live ddemo. This is the s
（6 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:47 | r4262 | |
顯示 diff（158 行未修改）
Nowadays: Open spending, municipality budgets.
Dutch
+
+
+
（3 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:47 – 08:47 | r4260 – r4261 | |
顯示 diff（157 行未修改）
0 artworks. Politwoops collect things spoken by politicians, usually stupid ones. Deleted tweets. Most of them are typos.
Nowadays: Open spending, municipality budgets.
- Du
+ Dutch
（3 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:47 | r4259 | |
顯示 diff（158 行未修改）
Nowadays: Open spending, municipality budgets.
Du
+
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:47 – 08:47 | r4238 – r4258 | |
顯示 diff（155 行未修改）
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
[ Open Education ] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. [Open Culture] Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
- 0 artworks. Politwoops collect things spoken by politicians, usually . Deleted tweets. Most of them are typos.
-
+ 0 artworks. Politwoops collect things spoken by politicians, usually stupid ones. Deleted tweets. Most of them are typos.
+ Nowadays: Open spending, municipality budgets.
+ Du
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:47 | r4237 | |
顯示 diff（155 行未修改）
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
[ Open Education ] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. [Open Culture] Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
- 0 artworks. Politwoops collect things spoken by politicians, usually . Deleted tweets. Most of them are typo
+ 0 artworks. Politwoops collect things spoken by politicians, usually . Deleted tweets. Most of them are typos.
（3 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:47 | r4236 | |
顯示 diff（155 行未修改）
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
[ Open Education ] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. [Open Culture] Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
- 0 artworks. Politwoops collect things spoken by politicians, usu. Deleted tweets. Most of them are typo
+ 0 artworks. Politwoops collect things spoken by politicians, usually . Deleted tweets. Most of them are typo
（3 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:47 | r4235 | |
顯示 diff（155 行未修改）
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
[ Open Education ] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. [Open Culture] Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
- 0 artworks. Politwoops collect things spoken by politicians, usu. Deleted tweets. Most of them are t
+ 0 artworks. Politwoops collect things spoken by politicians, usu. Deleted tweets. Most of them are typo
（3 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:47 | r4234 | |
顯示 diff（155 行未修改）
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
[ Open Education ] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. [Open Culture] Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
- 0 artworks. Politwoops collect things spoken by politicians, . Deleted tweets. Most of them are t
+ 0 artworks. Politwoops collect things spoken by politicians, usu. Deleted tweets. Most of them are t
（3 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:47 | r4233 | |
顯示 diff（155 行未修改）
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
[ Open Education ] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. [Open Culture] Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
- 0 artworks. Politwoops collect things spoken by politicians, . Deleted tweets. Most of them are
+ 0 artworks. Politwoops collect things spoken by politicians, . Deleted tweets. Most of them are t
（3 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:47 | r4232 | |
顯示 diff（155 行未修改）
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
[ Open Education ] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. [Open Culture] Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
- 0 artworks. Politwoops collect things spoken by politicians. Deleted tweets. Most of them are
+ 0 artworks. Politwoops collect things spoken by politicians, . Deleted tweets. Most of them are
（3 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:47 – 08:47 | r4217 – r4231 | |
顯示 diff（155 行未修改）
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
[ Open Education ] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. [Open Culture] Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
- 0 artworks. Politwoops collect things spoken by politicians.
+ 0 artworks. Politwoops collect things spoken by politicians. Deleted tweets. Most of them are
（3 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:47 – 08:47 | r4202 – r4216 | |
顯示 diff（155 行未修改）
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
[ Open Education ] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. [Open Culture] Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
- 0 artworks. Politwoops coo
+ 0 artworks. Politwoops collect things spoken by politicians.
（3 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:47 | r4201 | |
顯示 diff（154 行未修改）
Lessons learned In financial transparancy
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
- [] Open Education ] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. [Open Culture] Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
+ [ Open Education ] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. [Open Culture] Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
0 artworks. Politwoops coo
（4 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:47 | r4200 | |
顯示 diff（155 行未修改）
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
[] Open Education ] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. [Open Culture] Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
- 0 artworks. Politwoops cooo
+ 0 artworks. Politwoops coo
（3 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:47 – 08:47 | r4198 – r4199 | |
顯示 diff（154 行未修改）
Lessons learned In financial transparancy
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
- [] Open Education ] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. [Open Culture ]Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
+ [] Open Education ] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. [Open Culture] Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
0 artworks. Politwoops cooo
（4 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:47 | r4197 | |
顯示 diff（155 行未修改）
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
[] Open Education ] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. [Open Culture ]Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
- 0 artworks. Politwoops cooo=
+ 0 artworks. Politwoops cooo
（3 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:47 | r4196 | |
顯示 diff（154 行未修改）
Lessons learned In financial transparancy
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
- [] Open Education ] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. [Open CultureAlso about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
+ [] Open Education ] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. [Open Culture ]Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
0 artworks. Politwoops cooo=
（4 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:47 | r4195 | |
顯示 diff（155 行未修改）
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
[] Open Education ] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. [Open CultureAlso about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
- 0 artworks. Politwoops cooo
+ 0 artworks. Politwoops cooo=
（3 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:47 | r4194 | |
顯示 diff（154 行未修改）
Lessons learned In financial transparancy
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
- [] Open Education ] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. [Open CultAlso about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
+ [] Open Education ] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. [Open CultureAlso about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
0 artworks. Politwoops cooo
（4 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:47 | r4193 | |
顯示 diff（155 行未修改）
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
[] Open Education ] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. [Open CultAlso about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
- 0 artworks. Politwoops c
+ 0 artworks. Politwoops cooo
（3 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:47 | r4192 | |
顯示 diff（154 行未修改）
Lessons learned In financial transparancy
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
- [] Open Education ] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. [Open CAlso about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
+ [] Open Education ] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. [Open CultAlso about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
0 artworks. Politwoops c
（4 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:47 | r4191 | |
顯示 diff（155 行未修改）
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
[] Open Education ] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. [Open CAlso about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
- 0 artworks. Politwoops
+ 0 artworks. Politwoops c
（3 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:46 – 08:47 | r4181 – r4190 | |
顯示 diff（154 行未修改）
Lessons learned In financial transparancy
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
- [] Open Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
+ [] Open Education ] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. [Open CAlso about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
0 artworks. Politwoops
（4 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:46 | r4180 | |
顯示 diff（155 行未修改）
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
[] Open Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
- 0 artworks. Politwoops f
+ 0 artworks. Politwoops
（3 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:46 | r4179 | |
顯示 diff（154 行未修改）
Lessons learned In financial transparancy
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
- [] OpeBasically school data so people know about the schools to go to. Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
+ [] Open Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
0 artworks. Politwoops f
（4 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:46 | r4178 | |
顯示 diff（155 行未修改）
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
[] OpeBasically school data so people know about the schools to go to. Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
- 0 artworks. Politwoops famo
+ 0 artworks. Politwoops f
（3 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:46 | r4177 | |
顯示 diff（154 行未修改）
Lessons learned In financial transparancy
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
- [] OpBasically school data so people know about the schools to go to. Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
+ [] OpeBasically school data so people know about the schools to go to. Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
0 artworks. Politwoops famo
（4 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:46 | r4176 | |
顯示 diff（155 行未修改）
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
[] OpBasically school data so people know about the schools to go to. Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
- 0 artworks. Politwoops famous
+ 0 artworks. Politwoops famo
（3 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:46 | r4175 | |
顯示 diff（154 行未修改）
Lessons learned In financial transparancy
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
- [] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
+ [] OpBasically school data so people know about the schools to go to. Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
0 artworks. Politwoops famous
（4 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:46 | r4174 | |
顯示 diff（155 行未修改）
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
[] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
- 0 artworks. Politwoops famous th
+ 0 artworks. Politwoops famous
（3 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:46 | r4173 | |
顯示 diff（154 行未修改）
Lessons learned In financial transparancy
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
- []Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
+ [] Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
0 artworks. Politwoops famous th
（4 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:46 – 08:46 | r4171 – r4172 | |
顯示 diff（155 行未修改）
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
[]Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
- 0 artworks. Politwoops famo
+ 0 artworks. Politwoops famous th
（3 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:46 | r4170 | |
顯示 diff（154 行未修改）
Lessons learned In financial transparancy
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
- *Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
+ []Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
0 artworks. Politwoops famo
（4 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:46 – 08:46 | r4168 – r4169 | |
顯示 diff（155 行未修改）
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
*Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
- 0 artworks. Politwoops
+ 0 artworks. Politwoops famo
（3 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:46 – 08:46 | r4166 – r4167 | |
顯示 diff（154 行未修改）
Lessons learned In financial transparancy
Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
- Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
+ *Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
0 artworks. Politwoops
（4 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:45 – 08:46 | r4054 – r4165 | |
顯示 diff（153 行未修改）
討論內容 Discussions
Lessons learned In financial transparancy
- Since 2008, O
-
-
+ Since 2008, Open state foundation. Like mysociety but smaller. They have dome some projects: Open Enducation, Open culture, politwoops... etc.
+ Basically school data so people know about the schools to go to. Also about museum digitizing works but with 40 API. Open culture API has 800
+ 0 artworks. Politwoops
（3 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:45 | r4053 | |
顯示 diff（154 行未修改）
Lessons learned In financial transparancy
Since 2008, O
+
+
+
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:45 | r4052 | |
顯示 diff（153 行未修改）
討論內容 Discussions
Lessons learned In financial transparancy
- Since 2008,
+ Since 2008, O
（2 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:45 | r4051 | |
顯示 diff（154 行未修改）
Lessons learned In financial transparancy
Since 2008,
+
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:45 – 08:45 | r4045 – r4050 | |
顯示 diff（153 行未修改）
討論內容 Discussions
Lessons learned In financial transparancy
+ Since 2008,
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 08:45 – 08:45 | r4024 – r4044 | |
顯示 diff（152 行未修改）
討論內容 Discussions
-
+ Lessons learned In financial transparancy
總結 Conclusions
（1 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 06:38 – 06:55 | r3660 – r4023 | |
顯示 diff（115 行未修改）
Once you succeeded and if the next thing does not add up the success, it is seen automatically as failure.
Conflict arises.
- The problem is not the politic. Say we have a very brilliant party secretary who is also a very beautiful girl, and the media is all reporting the color of her lipstick. Media is picturing the pirate party as always fighting, anarchists, etc.
- It's easier this way. It's harder to write about what pirates party has changed, our success, etc.
+ The problem is not the politic. Say we have a very brilliant party secretary who is also a very beautiful girl, and the media is all reporting the color of her lipstick. Media is picturing the pirate party as always fighting, saying "fuck" on twitters, anarchists, etc. It's easier this way. It's harder to write about what pirates party has changed, our success, etc.
Media in Germany is a kind of strait to a traditional way.
It's like first you fought, then you win, then they fight you.
+
+ I am pretty sure in 5 or 10 yrs, we will be there. No, we are not dead yet. But we are not completely prepared for when we win. We are prepared to vote the bills, go to politics, but we are totally unprepared for the media, the reports, etc.
+ Why not start your own media? Good idea, we actually tried this in several cases but it is hard. If you do youtube broadcast it is cheap but you can only reach those people that are already listening.
+ Showing other political parties that you are not there existential threat might help. Seek collaboration with other parties, get some bills passed, then that would be a demonstration of your commitment(?).
總結 Conclusions
（29 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 06:38 | r3659 | |
顯示 diff（119 行未修改）
Media in Germany is a kind of strait to a traditional way.
-
It's like first you fought, then you win, then they fight you.
（32 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 06:37 – 06:37 | r3632 – r3658 | |
顯示 diff（119 行未修改）
Media in Germany is a kind of strait to a traditional way.
+
+ It's like first you fought, then you win, then they fight you.
（31 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 06:36 – 06:36 | r3629 – r3631 | |
顯示 diff（117 行未修改）
The problem is not the politic. Say we have a very brilliant party secretary who is also a very beautiful girl, and the media is all reporting the color of her lipstick. Media is picturing the pirate party as always fighting, anarchists, etc.
It's easier this way. It's harder to write about what pirates party has changed, our success, etc.
-
+ Media in Germany is a kind of strait to a traditional way.
（31 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 06:35 – 06:35 | r3627 – r3628 | |
顯示 diff（117 行未修改）
The problem is not the politic. Say we have a very brilliant party secretary who is also a very beautiful girl, and the media is all reporting the color of her lipstick. Media is picturing the pirate party as always fighting, anarchists, etc.
It's easier this way. It's harder to write about what pirates party has changed, our success, etc.
+
+
（31 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 06:35 | r3626 | |
顯示 diff（117 行未修改）
The problem is not the politic. Say we have a very brilliant party secretary who is also a very beautiful girl, and the media is all reporting the color of her lipstick. Media is picturing the pirate party as always fighting, anarchists, etc.
It's easier this way. It's harder to write about what pirates party has changed, our success, etc.
+
（30 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 06:35 | r3625 | |
顯示 diff（116 行未修改）
Conflict arises.
The problem is not the politic. Say we have a very brilliant party secretary who is also a very beautiful girl, and the media is all reporting the color of her lipstick. Media is picturing the pirate party as always fighting, anarchists, etc.
- It's easier this way. It's harder to write about what pirates party has changed, our success, et
+ It's easier this way. It's harder to write about what pirates party has changed, our success, etc.
（30 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 06:35 | r3624 | |
顯示 diff（117 行未修改）
The problem is not the politic. Say we have a very brilliant party secretary who is also a very beautiful girl, and the media is all reporting the color of her lipstick. Media is picturing the pirate party as always fighting, anarchists, etc.
It's easier this way. It's harder to write about what pirates party has changed, our success, et
+
總結 Conclusions
（29 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 06:32 – 06:35 | r3442 – r3623 | |
顯示 diff（114 行未修改）
Once you succeeded and if the next thing does not add up the success, it is seen automatically as failure.
+ Conflict arises.
+ The problem is not the politic. Say we have a very brilliant party secretary who is also a very beautiful girl, and the media is all reporting the color of her lipstick. Media is picturing the pirate party as always fighting, anarchists, etc.
+ It's easier this way. It's harder to write about what pirates party has changed, our success, et
總結 Conclusions
（29 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 06:31 – 06:31 | r3421 – r3441 | |
顯示 diff（110 行未修改）
討論內容 Discussions
-
+ What next after we Win!?
So we won and we get there. Suggestions of next move?
（32 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 06:29 – 06:30 | r3321 – r3420 | |
顯示 diff（110 行未修改）
討論內容 Discussions
+
+ So we won and we get there. Suggestions of next move?
+ Once you succeeded and if the next thing does not add up the success, it is seen automatically as failure.
總結 Conclusions
（29 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 06:29 – 06:29 | r3317 – r3320 | |
顯示 diff（144 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-11-09 03:58 – 06:20 | r298 – r3316 | |
顯示 diff（2 行未修改）
- *#1 10:50 - 11:30 主題 Topic:
+
+ *#2 11:35 - 12:15 主題 Topic: Negotiations
現場直播網址 live url、錄影紀錄網址 video url、照片紀錄網址 photos url
參與者 Contributors: (請簽名 sign here)
- 發表者 Present by: (可不填 optional)
+ 發表者 Present by: David Eaves (@deaves)
討論內容 Discussions
+ First experience of contributing to open source, made a bug report, immediate response was "bet its a duplicate" - factually correct but emotionally unwelcoming. Dis-incentivises participation.
+ In a movement building like in open source, your social capital is your only capital. Your people are your only asset, and how you manage it will determine your success rate.
- 總結 Conclusions
- (海報照片 photo of your poster)
+ Even when people agree that they need to agree, they suck at it.
+ Substance/relationship tension: binary choice between relationship between people and outcome of conversation (e.g. stronger relationship = less factually correct outcome).
+ Different groups stabilise in different quadrants, the aim is to stabilise in the upper right quadrant, where you can be confident that a relationship is strong enough to withstand any substance. When you're operating in that quadrant, you'd never call it a negotiation. Calling something a 'negotiation' is a symbol that you have predetermined that it is likely to go wrong. It sets you up for failure.
+ Exercise: people pair up, no talking, given partial rules of a game, 10 seconds to earn points. People recognise the game as 'arm wrestling', but it is never explicitly named, and yet we still bring the default behaviours of arm wrestling with us.
- *#2 11:35 - 12:15 主題 Topic:
- 現場直播網址 live url、錄影紀錄網址 video url、照片紀錄網址 photos url
- 參與者 Contributors: (請簽名 sign here)
- 發表者 Present by: (可不填 optional)
+ The same goes for negotiation, we have partial rules and default behaviours. The only solution is to find an effective means of communication. (Consequently power accumulates in those that are most effective communicators.)
- 討論內容 Discussions
+ A common pattern in conflict resolution is "I did something nice to them last week and they spat on us, now it is all on them to make reparations." It may take 2 or 3 attempts at concession before the notion is effectively transmitted, as the first response you got was just a reflex.
+
+ This is why it is so fundamentally important that groups of diverse people getting clear alignment of their goals, because the default behaviours and partial communication problem can very rapidly corrupt the original purpose.
+
+ You can come to a negotiation with different assumptions e.g "the other person is stupid/crazy/evil" vs "they are doing what they believe to be in their best interest". Different assumptions can be either debilitating or empowering.
+
+ Traditional positional bargaining: start from extreme positions, make small concessions and threats, and eventually make enough concessions to get to a deal. This model is based on lying: 'yesterday I said I can only make this concession, but today I actually can make more concessions.' If your opponent sees that you are lying, they can rationally assume that your 'final word' is not the final word. E.g. you can always assume the opening offer is the start of a negotiation position that will eventually result in further concessions.
+
+ Interpersonal interaction models don't scale effectively, but culture can. e.g. When you're starting an open source project, you can establish a healthy culture in the early days, that can then scale up as the project grows.
+
+ Better model: Interests | Options | Legitimacy
+
+ Rather than thinking 'what is the demand', think about 'what motivates them, what do they care about, what do I care about' - that is what we're actually negotiation about: different parties getting their needs met. If you can establish the interests of the other party ("What do you want?"), you're much more likely to get to a mutually beneficial resolution.
+
+ This works well when it is fuelled by a relationship (e.g. a sense of mutual respect) and effective communication.
+
+ Big communities have big interpersonal problems. Need to establish strong relationships and effective communication protocols at the outset of any project. Without it, whenever there's a negotiation, it will frequently result in people going to alternatives (e.g. I will leave), and much less likely to commit to something constructive (I will stay).
+
+ Increasing the frequency of interactions is one way to improve the likelihood of positive negotiations, e.g. I get to learn to trust you over time.
+ A mediator's job is to work on the relationship and communication, to establish a healthy foundation from which to start a productive negotiation of interests.
總結 Conclusions
（3 行未修改）
- *#3 13:30 - 14:10 主題 Topic:
+ *#3 13:30 - 14:10 主題 Topic: Organising without bosses
現場直播網址 live url、錄影紀錄網址 video url、照片紀錄網址 photos url
參與者 Contributors: (請簽名 sign here)
- 發表者 Present by: (可不填 optional)
+ 發表者 Present by: Rich Bartlett from Loomio (@richdecibels)
- 討論內容 Discussions
+ Transitioning from a swarm to a coherent organisation without compromising on principles of radically participatory democracy.
+ *Scenario:
+ Loomio crowdfunded $130k (USD), made some promises for what will be delivered and when it will be delivered. This 'scarce resource' needs to be divided equitably between a diversity of stakeholders. So we are developing a framework + processes + roles + tactics to solve this dilemma, relatively happily (so far so good!)
- 總結 Conclusions
- (海報照片 photo of your poster)
+ *Framework:
+
+ *Purpose: Why do we exist, what are our goals? Write it down!
+ *Principles: How do we want to behave? Slightly more dynamic and flexible.
+ *Priorities: What do we want to achieve in a given timeframe with given resources?
+ *Programs: How can we group those distinct tasks into coherent work programs?
+ *People: Who is the best person to perform these tasks?
+
+ *Process:
+ The purpose is set in stone so it needs to be established by long slow consensus: everyone needs to love it.
+
+ The principles are slightly more dynamic and flexible, they evolve over time.
+
+ The priorities change every X months: which part of vision do we want to achieve in that time?
+
+ All members participate in a collaborative process to establish the relative priorities between programs, like participatory budgeting: we have $100k or 200hrs to spend on these programs, how would you split it up? Diversity of opinion at this point exposes where there is incomplete information - focus your energy on developing further shared understanding.
+
+ It's important to establish all this groundwork before deciding who should do what job, otherwise you are just hiring based on social hierarchy. Instead, want to find what are the actual needs of the project and who is best positioned to meet them. Tradeoff between selecting specialists and generalists.
+
+ *Roles
+ Contributor: someone making tangible improvements to the project, voluntary or paid
+ Member: someone who has been contributing > 1 year, invited by consensus of the other members.
+
+ *Tactics
+ Every work program has a stated outcome (e.g. "engaged and growing userbase") + a coordinator (person who knows the status of all the tasks, and interfaces with other work programs to ensure alignment) + a budget (as allocated by the members).
+
+ Hiring is done by a panel composed of the coordinator + an expert (internal or external) + any member that has an interest.
+
+ Delegations are temporary and retractable, e.g. coordinators are reaffirmed every 3 months. Any member can veto anything. All work programs are as transparent as possible, and as participatory as makes sense (e.g. the Loomio roadmap is public, and the Loomio Community helps set strategy).
+
+ All Hands Meeting - same time and place every week, open to anyone interested in the project, creates collective identity, converts interested people into contributors and then members.
+
+ Check-ins: start most meetings with a round where we hear from everyone - 'how do you feel? what's on your mind?'. Creates 'politica afectiva' - people relate to each other with affection, the care about each other = strong relationships. Also safe space to challenge strategy ('I feel anxious that we made some bad decisions...'). Gives everyone space to practice self-expression, which is first fundamental skill of real democracy.
+
+ Conflict resolution - every contributor/member must have direct line of communication to every other contributor/member. Creates immunity to informal hierarchy. If we see one of those lines weakening due to some conflict/tension, immediately mobilise to resolve it and reestablish healthy communication.
+ Peer support: every member has a steward, and they are a steward to someone else too. Stewards provide accountability + support that you would normally get from a boss.
+ *helps to orient newcomers (any questions - ask your steward)
+ *resolve conflict (your steward is always on your side)
+ *professional development (like a life coach, informal meeting where you discuss what you want to achieve, and periodically review personal goals )
（39 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-10-31 21:00 – 21:06 | r217 – r297 | |
顯示 diff（2 行未修改）
- *主題 Topic:
- 時間 Time: 10:50 - 11:30
+ *#1 10:50 - 11:30 主題 Topic:
現場直播網址 live url、錄影紀錄網址 video url、照片紀錄網址 photos url
參與者 Contributors: (請簽名 sign here)
（3 行未修改）
- 總結 / 成果 Conclusions / Achievements
- (photo of your poster)
+ 總結 Conclusions
+ (海報照片 photo of your poster)
+
+
+
+
+ *#2 11:35 - 12:15 主題 Topic:
+ 現場直播網址 live url、錄影紀錄網址 video url、照片紀錄網址 photos url
+ 參與者 Contributors: (請簽名 sign here)
+ 發表者 Present by: (可不填 optional)
+
+ 討論內容 Discussions
+
+
+ 總結 Conclusions
+ (海報照片 photo of your poster)
+
+
+
+
+ *#3 13:30 - 14:10 主題 Topic:
+ 現場直播網址 live url、錄影紀錄網址 video url、照片紀錄網址 photos url
+ 參與者 Contributors: (請簽名 sign here)
+ 發表者 Present by: (可不填 optional)
+
+ 討論內容 Discussions
+
+
+ 總結 Conclusions
+ (海報照片 photo of your poster)
+
+
+
+
+ *#4 14:15 - 14:55 主題 Topic:
+ 現場直播網址 live url、錄影紀錄網址 video url、照片紀錄網址 photos url
+ 參與者 Contributors: (請簽名 sign here)
+ 發表者 Present by: (可不填 optional)
+
+ 討論內容 Discussions
+
+
+ 總結 Conclusions
+ (海報照片 photo of your poster)
+
+
+
+
+ *#5 15:45 - 16:25 主題 Topic:
+ 現場直播網址 live url、錄影紀錄網址 video url、照片紀錄網址 photos url
+ 參與者 Contributors: (請簽名 sign here)
+ 發表者 Present by: (可不填 optional)
+
+ 討論內容 Discussions
+
+
+ 總結 Conclusions
+ (海報照片 photo of your poster)
+
+
+
+
+ *#6 16:30-17:10 主題 Topic:
+ 現場直播網址 live url、錄影紀錄網址 video url、照片紀錄網址 photos url
+ 參與者 Contributors: (請簽名 sign here)
+ 發表者 Present by: (可不填 optional)
+
+ 討論內容 Discussions
+
+
+ 總結 Conclusions
+ (海報照片 photo of your poster)
|
||
| 2014-10-31 18:31 – 18:44 | r3 – r216 | |
顯示 diff- Ideas Pool @ g0v summit 2014 unconference
+ R107 Sessions@ g0v summit 2014 unconference
more info: g0v summit 2014 unconf hackfoldr
-
- *遊戲規則 how to play
-
- *11/8
-
- unconference 主題登記時間
-
- 為了節省 unconference 活動當天的寶貴時間，請大家在活動前先寫下各自想聊的主題，
-
+ *主題 Topic:
+ 時間 Time: 10:50 - 11:30
+ 現場直播網址 live url、錄影紀錄網址 video url、照片紀錄網址 photos url
+ 參與者 Contributors: (請簽名 sign here)
+ 發表者 Present by: (可不填 optional)
- *格式 template
+ 討論內容 Discussions
- *主題 title
- *摘要 summary：
- *語言 language：
- *提案人 by：
- *Ideas Pool
- *
+ 總結 / 成果 Conclusions / Achievements
+ (photo of your poster)
|
||
| 2014-10-31 18:30 | r2 | |
顯示 diff（23 行未修改）
|
||
| 2014-10-31 18:30 | r1 | |
顯示 diff- Untitled
+ Ideas Pool @ g0v summit 2014 unconference
+ more info: g0v summit 2014 unconf hackfoldr
- This pad text is synchronized as you type, so that everyone viewing this page sees the same text. This allows you to collaborate seamlessly on documents!
+ *遊戲規則 how to play
+
+ *11/8
+
+ unconference 主題登記時間
+
+ 為了節省 unconference 活動當天的寶貴時間，請大家在活動前先寫下各自想聊的主題，
+
+
+
+
+ *格式 template
+
+ *主題 title
+ *摘要 summary：
+ *語言 language：
+ *提案人 by：
+
+ *Ideas Pool
+ *
|
||
| 2014-10-31 18:30 | r0 | |
顯示 diff+ Untitled
+ This pad text is synchronized as you type, so that everyone viewing this page sees the same text. This allows you to collaborate seamlessly on documents!
|
||